Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002?





  • 0

Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002?

Postby ajsy0203 » Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:23 am

    



Last night at E-Gala of Miss Universe Malaysia 2020, the pageant organizers aired a video of good luck from dethroned and original Miss Universe 2002 Oxana Fedorova and they captioned in her video that she is Miss Universe 2002 yet MUO still recognized Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002 on their website and removed Oxana from the list of former titleholders.

Do you think Miss Elaine Daly and her team are trying to discredit Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002 since she completed the remaining 8 months of Oxana's supposed full reign as Miss Universe? Do you think MUO and Madam Paula are already forgiven Oxana so they allowed Miss Universe Malaysia to acknowledge Oxana as Miss Universe 2002?


User avatar
ajsy0203
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:55 am
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 4760
Real Life Name/Nick: AJ
Date of Birth: 05 Sep 1986
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Office Staff
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Tiger
Hobbies/Interests: Teaching
Message: Write a message here

  • 2

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby beautywatchnyc » Sun Sep 06, 2020 1:48 am


Everyone knows Oxana was the original titleholder, thus the triumph and feat will always remain in memory and on records. Ms. Justine Pasek assumed the crown ONLY after Oxana relinquished her title owing the latter's decision and personal wishes. Whether right or wrong, that is not the issue here. E Gala Ms U Malaysia should not be faulted if they wanted to give the honors and recognition due the original queen.
User avatar
beautywatchnyc
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
 
Posts: 9630
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: New York City (former) now residing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, SW5
Country: United Kingdom (uk)
Reputation: 14068
Real Life Name/Nick: david
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: HR Consultancy, Professional Cooking
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Chinese Zodiac: Horse
Hobbies/Interests: Surfing D Net Cooking Travel Reading Pho2graphy
Message: Need to reflect the other side of my citizenship

  • 0

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby Elyerno Zabagguri » Sun Sep 06, 2020 3:19 am

JUSTINE PASEK IS MISS UNIVERSE 2002.
Anyway, whether they recognize Justine Pasek or Oxana Lazy girl as Miss Universe 2002, still they will clap hard at Miss Universe 2021.
Image
User avatar
Elyerno Zabagguri
ENTERTAINERS are FUNNY people.
ENTERTAINERS are FUNNY people.
 
Posts: 1614
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2019 12:38 pm
Location: Tatar ASSR
Country: Russia (ru)
Reputation: 1745
Real Life Name/Nick: Superstar Elyerno
Date of Birth: 02 Sep 1988
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Gay
Profession: Writer, Producer, Talent Manager
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Dragon
Hobbies/Interests: Beauty Pageants, Showbiz
Message: THE REAL B*TCH IN TOWN!

  • 0

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby ajsy0203 » Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:25 am

beautywatchnyc wrote:
Everyone knows Oxana was the original titleholder, thus the triumph and feat will always remain in memory and on records. Ms. Justine Pasek assumed the crown ONLY after Oxana relinquished her title owing the latter's decision and personal wishes. Whether right or wrong, that is not the issue here. E Gala Ms U Malaysia should not be faulted if they wanted to give the honors and recognition due the original queen.


Then other franchise holders will recognize the dethroned/resigned queens too like Helen Morgan as Miss World 1974, Gabriela Brum as Miss World 1980, Džejla Glavović as Miss Earth 2002 and Anea Garcia as Miss Gwand International 2015?
User avatar
ajsy0203
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:55 am
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 4760
Real Life Name/Nick: AJ
Date of Birth: 05 Sep 1986
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Office Staff
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Tiger
Hobbies/Interests: Teaching
Message: Write a message here

  • 2

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby beautywatchnyc » Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:50 am

ajsy0203 wrote:
beautywatchnyc wrote:
Everyone knows Oxana was the original titleholder, thus the triumph and feat will always remain in memory and on records. Ms. Justine Pasek assumed the crown ONLY after Oxana relinquished her title owing the latter's decision and personal wishes. Whether right or wrong, that is not the issue here. E Gala Ms U Malaysia should not be faulted if they wanted to give the honors and recognition due the original queen.


Then other franchise holders will recognize the dethroned/resigned queens too like Helen Morgan as Miss World 1974, Gabriela Brum as Miss World 1980, Džejla Glavović as Miss Earth 2002 and Anea Garcia as Miss Gwand International 2015?


Why should that be a burden to you? Why, what, and how is that severely wrong giving recognition to the A+ efforts and hard work done by the original winner? After all, the crown has been relinquished and the "2nd best" has taken the replacement. More than consolation or a stroke of good luck that suffices already the technical and legal requirements after any "dethronement" is effected. The caveat: What will prevent a name recall from and by those who had chosen the winner from among the finalists, of how superior the original queen performed relative the rest, and how she captured the final vote of the judging panel in a consensus? In the minds of the adoring public, there was only one winner to the finale from the get go and nothing can alter that (no matter how effective the PR machine goes or marketing strategies are put in place in favor of the newly designated queen.)
User avatar
beautywatchnyc
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
 
Posts: 9630
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: New York City (former) now residing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, SW5
Country: United Kingdom (uk)
Reputation: 14068
Real Life Name/Nick: david
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: HR Consultancy, Professional Cooking
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Chinese Zodiac: Horse
Hobbies/Interests: Surfing D Net Cooking Travel Reading Pho2graphy
Message: Need to reflect the other side of my citizenship

  • 1

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby ajsy0203 » Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:05 am

beautywatchnyc wrote:
ajsy0203 wrote:
beautywatchnyc wrote:
Everyone knows Oxana was the original titleholder, thus the triumph and feat will always remain in memory and on records. Ms. Justine Pasek assumed the crown ONLY after Oxana relinquished her title owing the latter's decision and personal wishes. Whether right or wrong, that is not the issue here. E Gala Ms U Malaysia should not be faulted if they wanted to give the honors and recognition due the original queen.


Then other franchise holders will recognize the dethroned/resigned queens too like Helen Morgan as Miss World 1974, Gabriela Brum as Miss World 1980, Džejla Glavović as Miss Earth 2002 and Anea Garcia as Miss Gwand International 2015?


Why should that be a burden to you? Why, what, and how is that severely wrong giving recognition to the A+ efforts and hard work done by the original winner? After all, the crown has been relinquished and the "2nd best" has taken the replacement. More than consolation or a stroke of good luck that suffices already the technical and legal requirements after any "dethronement" is effected. The caveat: What will prevent a name recall from and by those who had chosen the winner from among the finalists, of how superior the original queen performed relative the rest, and how she captured the final vote of the judging panel in a consensus? In the minds of the adoring public, there was only one winner to the finale from the get go and nothing can alter that (no matter how effective the PR machine goes or marketing strategies are put in place in favor of the newly designated queen.)


So they should allowed Helen M., Gabriela B., Džejla and Anea to recognize their achievements too aside from Oxana?
User avatar
ajsy0203
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:55 am
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 4760
Real Life Name/Nick: AJ
Date of Birth: 05 Sep 1986
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Office Staff
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Tiger
Hobbies/Interests: Teaching
Message: Write a message here

  • 0

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby beautywatchnyc » Sun Sep 06, 2020 10:56 am

ajsy0203 wrote:
beautywatchnyc wrote:
ajsy0203 wrote:
beautywatchnyc wrote:
Everyone knows Oxana was the original titleholder, thus the triumph and feat will always remain in memory and on records. Ms. Justine Pasek assumed the crown ONLY after Oxana relinquished her title owing the latter's decision and personal wishes. Whether right or wrong, that is not the issue here. E Gala Ms U Malaysia should not be faulted if they wanted to give the honors and recognition due the original queen.


Then other franchise holders will recognize the dethroned/resigned queens too like Helen Morgan as Miss World 1974, Gabriela Brum as Miss World 1980, Džejla Glavović as Miss Earth 2002 and Anea Garcia as Miss Gwand International 2015?


Why should that be a burden to you? Why, what, and how is that severely wrong giving recognition to the A+ efforts and hard work done by the original winner? After all, the crown has been relinquished and the "2nd best" has taken the replacement. More than consolation or a stroke of good luck that suffices already the technical and legal requirements after any "dethronement" is effected. The caveat: What will prevent a name recall from and by those who had chosen the winner from among the finalists, of how superior the original queen performed relative the rest, and how she captured the final vote of the judging panel in a consensus? In the minds of the adoring public, there was only one winner to the finale from the get go and nothing can alter that (no matter how effective the PR machine goes or marketing strategies are put in place in favor of the newly designated queen.)


So they should allowed Helen M., Gabriela B., Džejla and Anea to recognize their achievements too aside from Oxana?


"Allow" reeks of an oversimplification as to what and how this context purports. That decision was not for every outsider within periphery to make. Besides, what might be applicable to one should not be taken as norm for all. A decision was taken by the respective organization for purposes which are unknown to many of us; or reached on the basis of a unique situation, or due the conflict of causes as to what may have been imperiled reason. What was deemed observable did not necessarily explain nor confirm a doubtful information occurring within that no outsider was privy or that he/she might have been impaired by a lack of sufficient information to draw from.
User avatar
beautywatchnyc
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
 
Posts: 9630
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: New York City (former) now residing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, SW5
Country: United Kingdom (uk)
Reputation: 14068
Real Life Name/Nick: david
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: HR Consultancy, Professional Cooking
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Chinese Zodiac: Horse
Hobbies/Interests: Surfing D Net Cooking Travel Reading Pho2graphy
Message: Need to reflect the other side of my citizenship

  • 0

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby sOUTH BEaCH » Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:25 am

ajsy0203 wrote:

Last night at E-Gala of Miss Universe Malaysia 2020, the pageant organizers aired a video of good luck from dethroned and original Miss Universe 2002 Oxana Fedorova and they captioned in her video that she is Miss Universe 2002 yet MUO still recognized Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002 on their website and removed Oxana from the list of former titleholders.

Do you think Miss Elaine Daly and her team are trying to discredit Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002 since she completed the remaining 8 months of Oxana's supposed full reign as Miss Universe? Do you think MUO and Madam Paula are already forgiven Oxana so they allowed Miss Universe Malaysia to acknowledge Oxana as Miss Universe 2002?

SADNESS! BECAUSE OXANA IS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WINNERS OF ALL TIME! - I THINK JUSTINE DIDN'T DESERVE TO BE MISS UNIVERSE
sOUTH BEaCH
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:26 am
Country: Australia (au)
Reputation: 1394
Date of Birth: 19 Dec 1999
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Straight
Profession: Fly auxiliar
Western Zodiac Sign: Sagittarius
Chinese Zodiac: Rabbit
Hobbies/Interests: Travels, surfing, photography, beauty pageants
Message: Jesus Christ saves you from sin

  • 0

Re: Is Miss Universe Malaysia discredit Justine Pasek as Mis

Postby ajsy0203 » Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:37 am

sOUTH BEaCH wrote:
ajsy0203 wrote:

Last night at E-Gala of Miss Universe Malaysia 2020, the pageant organizers aired a video of good luck from dethroned and original Miss Universe 2002 Oxana Fedorova and they captioned in her video that she is Miss Universe 2002 yet MUO still recognized Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002 on their website and removed Oxana from the list of former titleholders.

Do you think Miss Elaine Daly and her team are trying to discredit Justine Pasek as Miss Universe 2002 since she completed the remaining 8 months of Oxana's supposed full reign as Miss Universe? Do you think MUO and Madam Paula are already forgiven Oxana so they allowed Miss Universe Malaysia to acknowledge Oxana as Miss Universe 2002?

SADNESS! BECAUSE OXANA IS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WINNERS OF ALL TIME! - I THINK JUSTINE DIDN'T DESERVE TO BE MISS UNIVERSE


That's the verdict of the telecast judges when they ranked each finalists after the final question. Most of the judges think Justine was the potential alternative in the event Oxana did not finish her reign and it became a reality.
User avatar
ajsy0203
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:55 am
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 4760
Real Life Name/Nick: AJ
Date of Birth: 05 Sep 1986
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Office Staff
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Tiger
Hobbies/Interests: Teaching
Message: Write a message here


Return to Miss Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Svetlryl, Walteralamn


contact us to advertise with missosology

Reputation System ©'