The Duchess wrote:Might as well...
Also, I do find the critique that the same countries place bugs me because in reality most of those countries always place because they put in the work.
South Africa, even if I don't like Zozi, puts in the work. Same with Philippines, Colombia, Puerto Rico (since Denise came), Thailand ect have sent complete delegates for years now.
keyss wrote:So all of a sudden sash factor is no more?
I'll believe that when those lazy and or bitchy Miss USA's start clapping. The placements in Miss Universe are so predicable that they try to throw people off by also giving placements to the most random girls at the same time. A smorgasbord basically.
Anyways, this continental thing is a no for me. They should focus more on making sure there are glam shots instead, since that's what set Miss Universe apart from Miss World.
emem wrote:
public voting should stick to Miss Photogenic
the most is giving a semi final slot to the highest voted candidate
more than that, no no
Queen of the Clouds wrote:I am very against public voting in any pageant
I don't mind the continental queens idea though
The Duchess wrote:Queen of the Clouds wrote:I am very against public voting in any pageant
I don't mind the continental queens idea though
But what if lets say the only representative for Asia in the Top 10 scored the lowest and was the worse of the 10, why should she be in the top 5?
alainclint wrote:If they want to stick to continental grouping, they have to separate Asia and Africa. Make it top 30:
North America
South America
Europe
Asia
Africa
Oceania
Then top 15.
Swimsuit.
Top 10
Evening gown
Top 5
Q & A with topic about the country representing.
Top 3
Q & A but one question.
Users browsing this forum: BeautyFan, Evarel