Oscillate wrote:Fetish mo ba ang pagtatanong???????
Gusto mo lang naman magtanong kung anong pageant ang makakabot kaya ng > 90 mark, eh marami ka pang hanash na wala namang relevance sa tanong. Komplikado po ba ang buhay n'yo?
hauteegirl wrote:I dont care about quantities. there's so many sub-territories that joined and i dont think that's fair. Just like China in Miss Asia-tv. there's like 6 of chinese girls and all of them took Top 5. que horror! 80 should be enough. I dont even see some of the girls on stage no longer than 1 second. Even worst in miss world, it's horrible in miss world, no contest in the final night, just award giving cookfest.
Reeves wrote:Mess World had reached more than a hundred contestants after they started admitting entries from territories which aren't countries at all.
Nina Cleopatra wrote:Who the hell cares about numbers? People want quality candidates, quality production, fair process, Gorgeous winner.
Nina Cleopatra wrote:Who the hell cares about numbers? People want quality candidates, quality production, fair process, Gorgeous winner.
ALANATOYA wrote:IT IS NOT THE QUANTITY BUT THE QUALITY OF DELEGATES THAT IS MORE IMPORTATION. MISS WORLD/GRAND INTERNATIONAL MAY HAVE 150 OR SO CANDIDATES BUT NONE OF THOSE GIRLS MIGHT EVEN MAKE IT IN THE SEMIS OF MISS UNIVERSE.
the critic wrote:ALANATOYA wrote:IT IS NOT THE QUANTITY BUT THE QUALITY OF DELEGATES THAT IS MORE IMPORTATION. MISS WORLD/GRAND INTERNATIONAL MAY HAVE 150 OR SO CANDIDATES BUT NONE OF THOSE GIRLS MIGHT EVEN MAKE IT IN THE SEMIS OF MISS UNIVERSE.
JUST LIKE HOW MPULE, GEORGINA RIZK AND ANGELA VISSER COULDN'T MAKE THE SEMIS AT MW BUT WON Miss Universe.
ajsy0203 wrote:Aside from Miss World which they have more than 100 contestants every year since 2003, which among the 4 international pageants will break the 90 contestant mark this year or will it delay again until 1 pageant will break that barrier at the right time?
Note: MTQI has 90-100 contestants in 2007-2009 & 2011 but most of the delegates were came from the same countries or even lacked residency that she would had been represented.
Broke 80 contestant mark:
Miss Universe: 1977, 1983-1984, 1995, 1998-1999, 2004-2006, 2008-present [highest turnout: 89 contestants in 2011 & 2012]
ME: 2005-present [highest turnout: 88 contestants in 2007 & 2013]
MS: 2013 & 2015 [highest turnout: 83 contestants in 2013]
MGI: 2014
MI: none [highest turnout: 73 contestants in 2014]
BIGBANG BAKS wrote:ajsy0203 wrote:Aside from Miss World which they have more than 100 contestants every year since 2003, which among the 4 international pageants will break the 90 contestant mark this year or will it delay again until 1 pageant will break that barrier at the right time?
Note: MTQI has 90-100 contestants in 2007-2009 & 2011 but most of the delegates were came from the same countries or even lacked residency that she would had been represented.
Broke 80 contestant mark:
Miss Universe: 1977, 1983-1984, 1995, 1998-1999, 2004-2006, 2008-present [highest turnout: 89 contestants in 2011 & 2012]
ME: 2005-present [highest turnout: 88 contestants in 2007 & 2013]
MS: 2013 & 2015 [highest turnout: 83 contestants in 2013]
MGI: 2014
MI: none [highest turnout: 73 contestants in 2014]
WHO CARES ABOUT THE NUMBER OF CANDIDATES. MISS UNIVERSE LIMITS THE NUMBER. IT DOES NOT NEED IT --IT HAS SPONSORS. ON THE OTHER HAND STRUGGLING PAGEANT AND MINOR LIKE ME, MW NEED FRANCHISEES TO SURVIVE. HANNA RESORT WON'T BE ENOUGH. AND MOST OF ITS SPONSORS ARE EXDEALS AND THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT MOST OF THEM ARE JUST PERMISSIONS TO HOLD PREPAGEANT ACTIVITIES AND NOT MONETARY
manoypoe wrote:IT SIMPLY SHOWS THAT MISS UNIVERSE IS FAR MORE FAIR THAN MISS WORLD. COZ IN MISS WORLD, THE CANDIDATES ARE NOT REALLY JUDGED, ONLY JULIA AND COHORTS DETERMINE THE SET OF WINNERS. SEE, THOSE WHO ARE IGNORED IN MISS WORLD, ARE PLACING IN MISS UNIVERSE COZ THEY TRULY ARE DESERVING TO PLACE.
the critic wrote:manoypoe wrote:IT SIMPLY SHOWS THAT MISS UNIVERSE IS FAR MORE FAIR THAN MISS WORLD. COZ IN MISS WORLD, THE CANDIDATES ARE NOT REALLY JUDGED, ONLY JULIA AND COHORTS DETERMINE THE SET OF WINNERS. SEE, THOSE WHO ARE IGNORED IN MISS WORLD, ARE PLACING IN MISS UNIVERSE COZ THEY TRULY ARE DESERVING TO PLACE.
LOL. THEN CLEARLY QUALITY AIN'T THE ISSUE IF MISS WORLD CAN AFFORD TO IGNORE GIRLS THAT COMEBACK TO WIN OR ALMOST WIN MISS UNIVERSE. IN A PAGEANT OF OVER 100 GIRLS WITH ONLY 15 OR 20 PLACEMENT "DESERVING" GIRLS ARE BOUND TO CLAPPED. Miss Universe HAS A TYPE MISS WORLD HAS A TYPE.
ITS VICE VERSA BECAUSE WE HAVE AGBANI, YARITZA, MICAELA REIS WHO PLACED AT Miss Universe AND WON OR ALMOST WON MISS WORLD.
manoypoe wrote:the critic wrote:manoypoe wrote:IT SIMPLY SHOWS THAT MISS UNIVERSE IS FAR MORE FAIR THAN MISS WORLD. COZ IN MISS WORLD, THE CANDIDATES ARE NOT REALLY JUDGED, ONLY JULIA AND COHORTS DETERMINE THE SET OF WINNERS. SEE, THOSE WHO ARE IGNORED IN MISS WORLD, ARE PLACING IN MISS UNIVERSE COZ THEY TRULY ARE DESERVING TO PLACE.
LOL. THEN CLEARLY QUALITY AIN'T THE ISSUE IF MISS WORLD CAN AFFORD TO IGNORE GIRLS THAT COMEBACK TO WIN OR ALMOST WIN MISS UNIVERSE. IN A PAGEANT OF OVER 100 GIRLS WITH ONLY 15 OR 20 PLACEMENT "DESERVING" GIRLS ARE BOUND TO CLAPPED. Miss Universe HAS A TYPE MISS WORLD HAS A TYPE.
ITS VICE VERSA BECAUSE WE HAVE AGBANI, YARITZA, MICAELA REIS WHO PLACED AT Miss Universe AND WON OR ALMOST WON MISS WORLD.
MISS UNIVERSE HAS FAR MORE SUPERIOR BEAUTIES THAN MISS WORLD. IT IS A SAD FACT WHICH IS HARD TO DIGEST IF YOU ARE DIE HARD FAN. THOUGH IN SOME OCCASIONS, MISS WORLDS WINNERS ARE REALLY TOPNOTCH. BUT MOST OF THE TIMES, THEY WIN BECAUSE OF POLITICS AND NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR PERFORMANCES.
the critic wrote:manoypoe wrote:the critic wrote:manoypoe wrote:IT SIMPLY SHOWS THAT MISS UNIVERSE IS FAR MORE FAIR THAN MISS WORLD. COZ IN MISS WORLD, THE CANDIDATES ARE NOT REALLY JUDGED, ONLY JULIA AND COHORTS DETERMINE THE SET OF WINNERS. SEE, THOSE WHO ARE IGNORED IN MISS WORLD, ARE PLACING IN MISS UNIVERSE COZ THEY TRULY ARE DESERVING TO PLACE.
LOL. THEN CLEARLY QUALITY AIN'T THE ISSUE IF MISS WORLD CAN AFFORD TO IGNORE GIRLS THAT COMEBACK TO WIN OR ALMOST WIN MISS UNIVERSE. IN A PAGEANT OF OVER 100 GIRLS WITH ONLY 15 OR 20 PLACEMENT "DESERVING" GIRLS ARE BOUND TO CLAPPED. Miss Universe HAS A TYPE MISS WORLD HAS A TYPE.
ITS VICE VERSA BECAUSE WE HAVE AGBANI, YARITZA, MICAELA REIS WHO PLACED AT Miss Universe AND WON OR ALMOST WON MISS WORLD.
MISS UNIVERSE HAS FAR MORE SUPERIOR BEAUTIES THAN MISS WORLD. IT IS A SAD FACT WHICH IS HARD TO DIGEST IF YOU ARE DIE HARD FAN. THOUGH IN SOME OCCASIONS, MISS WORLDS WINNERS ARE REALLY TOPNOTCH. BUT MOST OF THE TIMES, THEY WIN BECAUSE OF POLITICS AND NOT BECAUSE OF THEIR PERFORMANCES.
NO...MISS WORLD HAS FAR MORE SUPERIOR BEAUTIES THAN Miss Universe. IT IS A FACT. THE MOST CELEBRATED BEAUTY QUEENS ARE MISS WORLD WINNERS #FACT. MOST TIMES MISS UNIVERSE WINNERS WIN BECAUSE OF TV RATINGS, SPONSOR/FRANCHISE POLITICS OR FAN BASE PONDERING LIKE THE STRING OF LATINO, AMERICAN OR MOST RECENT FILIPINO WINNER. MANY DIDN'T EVEN HAVE BEST PERFORMANCES OR OUTSTANDING BEAUTY BUT STILL WON.
LOL
tresure wrote:MISS EARTH WILL DIE SOON . THE WINNERS SEEM USELESS
Handsama wrote:tresure wrote:MISS EARTH WILL DIE SOON . THE WINNERS SEEM USELESS
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]