sleuth08 wrote:NO IT SHOULD BE ALL EQUAL
lutosfeet wrote:Ayan kana naman sa tanong thread mo.. Well kailangan oa ba e memorize yan? kaya nga Beauty Pageant di lang ganda at talino its an overall package gurl. In case of Karen, matalino lang sya, yun lang, ang beauty nya di pang top crown..
Elle wrote:Nope they need to focus on the overall qualities of the girl.
I remember Alyz, Tereza, or even Jamie didn't necessarily have the best answers, but overall they were the best. I've seen the trend starting 2015 where the judges based the winner solely on their final answers, and those 30 seconds isn't a good overall measure, some girls could literally just be spewing out memorized lines that just happened to tie in with the question. At this rate all the save the environment and protect mother earth, and children are the future answers will always be guaranteed a spot in that top 4 and also leads to just ok winners like Angelia and Katherine, and then winners like last year's who lowered ME's standards even more. However, Miss Earth can also position itself like Miss America where they choose average girls, it'll lose interest from pageant fans for sure, but spike interest for more women who wants to join pageants but don't feel like they're beautiful enough
lutosfeet wrote:Ayan kana naman sa tanong thread mo.. Well kailangan oa ba e memorize yan? kaya nga Beauty Pageant di lang ganda at talino its an overall package gurl. In case of Karen, matalino lang sya, yun lang, ang beauty nya di pang top crown..
MrManila wrote:lutosfeet wrote:Ayan kana naman sa tanong thread mo.. Well kailangan oa ba e memorize yan? kaya nga Beauty Pageant di lang ganda at talino its an overall package gurl. In case of Karen, matalino lang sya, yun lang, ang beauty nya di pang top crown..
kaya lang kasi, beauty is subjective. may kanya kanya tayong taste kasi in terms of beauty. Karen may not be that beautiful to some, but some may find her really beautiful. depende kasi sa standards or sa titingin e...
Handsama wrote:Elle wrote:Nope they need to focus on the overall qualities of the girl.
I remember Alyz, Tereza, or even Jamie didn't necessarily have the best answers, but overall they were the best. I've seen the trend starting 2015 where the judges based the winner solely on their final answers, and those 30 seconds isn't a good overall measure, some girls could literally just be spewing out memorized lines that just happened to tie in with the question. At this rate all the save the environment and protect mother earth, and children are the future answers will always be guaranteed a spot in that top 4 and also leads to just ok winners like Angelia and Katherine, and then winners like last year's who lowered ME's standards even more. However, Miss Earth can also position itself like Miss America where they choose average girls, it'll lose interest from pageant fans for sure, but spike interest for more women who wants to join pageants but don't feel like they're beautiful enough
And yet Miss America beats Miss USA in TV ratings.
The reality is that the gay audience of international pageants is just a tiny fraction of the total audience. I read that straight women make up the majority of their TV viewers and this demographics isn’t as obsessed by beauty as gay men are. The women audience of today want their Queens to be able to represent them well out there. That’s why IMG is trying to evolve Miss USA and Miss Universe into crowning women that ordinary women can be proud of and identify with.
Paola De Bracho 2.0 wrote:the fact that these delegates made it in their national pageants means they all have the "knowledge" about this environmental blah blah blah. so why not choose a girl with "universal appeal" to win on this international pageant than choosing a blah blah girl that will destroy the image of this organization.
iamkenmotion wrote:Paola De Bracho 2.0 wrote:the fact that these delegates made it in their national pageants means they all have the "knowledge" about this environmental blah blah blah. so why not choose a girl with "universal appeal" to win on this international pageant than choosing a blah blah girl that will destroy the image of this organization.i totally agree. Karen is so mediocre in terms of beauty. She has no recent international trips. She isnt bankable. They are looking for a spokesperson right with a universal appeal? Karen is a spokeswoman but doesnt have a universal appeal.
Paola De Bracho 2.0 wrote:the fact that these delegates made it in their national pageants means they all have the "knowledge" about this environmental blah blah blah. so why not choose a girl with "universal appeal" to win on this international pageant than choosing a blah blah girl that will destroy the image of this organization.
lucy wrote:PEOPLE HAVE PREFERENCES WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF BEAUTY BUT WITH KAREN IBASCO THERE'S NO SMALL STRAIN OF BEAUTY AT ALL, SO A BEAUTY PREFERENCE IS NOT APPLICABLE TO HER!
iamkenmotion wrote:Paola De Bracho 2.0 wrote:.i totally agree. Karen is so mediocre in terms of beauty. She has no recent international trips. She isnt bankable. They are looking for a spokesperson right with a universal appeal? Karen is a spokeswoman but doesnt have a universal appeal.
lucy wrote:PEOPLE HAVE PREFERENCES WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF BEAUTY BUT WITH KAREN IBASCO THERE'S NO SMALL STRAIN OF BEAUTY AT ALL, SO A BEAUTY PREFERENCE IS NOT APPLICABLE TO HER!
Handsama wrote:iamkenmotion wrote:Paola De Bracho 2.0 wrote:.i totally agree. Karen is so mediocre in terms of beauty. She has no recent international trips. She isnt bankable. They are looking for a spokesperson right with a universal appeal? Karen is a spokeswoman but doesnt have a universal appeal.
Says who? A fan who hides behind his anonymity just like the rest of us. You might think you’re someone important here but out there in the real world, I doubt if you’ve even accomplished half of what Karen managed to do in her young life. So spare me...
bloomfield wrote:NO. I disagree, Mess Earth should maintain their advocacies to protect Mother Earth, its animals, and their habitats !!!! Please continue crowning cow-looking beauties, porkies, and troll-looking humpty-dumpy chicks !!!! It's already well-known around the globe that ME is a circus, quiz bee contest and NOT a beauty pageant. PEACE
bloomfield wrote:bloomfield wrote:NO. I disagree, Mess Earth should maintain their advocacies to protect Mother Earth, its animals, and their habitats !!!! Please continue crowning cow-looking beauties, porkies, and troll-looking humpty-dumpty chicks !!!! It's already well-known around the globe that ME is a circus, quiz bee contest and NOT a beauty pageant. PEACE
Handsama wrote:lucy wrote:PEOPLE HAVE PREFERENCES WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF BEAUTY BUT WITH KAREN IBASCO THERE'S NO SMALL STRAIN OF BEAUTY AT ALL, SO A BEAUTY PREFERENCE IS NOT APPLICABLE TO HER!
I know what you’re trying to do, lucy . You decided to join the Miss Earth hatefest hoping that people would forget about your favorite pageant’s own issues. Not gonna happen!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]