by Mebestme » Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:42 am
I wonder why everyone keeps on saying that Thailand didn’t answer the hashtag correctly. I thought she gave a good answer. The hashtag was, millennial, her answer was, millennials just like everyone of us people on this planet should help in protecting our mother earth. I thought that was witty. What answer are you guys expecting her to give. Out of all the girls in top 8, I thought she had the most genuine answer just like Colombia. Plus I like the fact that she was nervous and almost choked. I mean seriously, Miss Earth, if you have put her in Top 4 and went on to win the competition it would have been a home run for the pageant.
Venezuela on the other hand also deserves to be in the Final 4. I mean, the way she delivered that answer, I thought it was convincing. The problem I see is that because she was not able to express heraelf in english she had to have an interpreter, and we know that interpreters sometimes don’t actually translate the answers perfectly or like how the candidates would want their answers to be.
I thought, Colombia, Thailand, Venezuela and Philippines would have been a great top 4. Could probably be one of the strngest top 4 in history.
Now, I don’t know but somehow I feel like, something is wrong with the way the candidates are judged and how they are being scored. Makes you wonder how some girls were able to penetrate the Top 16 while others did not. I say, show us the score of all girls in all the 3 rounds. Something is fucking wrong. It’s obvious. I think to be transparent, scores should automatically be shown after each and every rounds. HOW DID AUSTRALIA MADE IT TO TOP 16 OF INTELLIGENCE?
My other problem with Miss Earth is, they are not consistent with what exactly is their basis for the winning candidate. Is it really the final q and a or is it base on the total package and beauty of the contestant?
If peoples contetion here is, the reason why Karen won the competition is because she’s smart and witty, I think it’s kinda unfair to the other girls. She’s not the only intelligent candidate there. If the sole basis of inning the crown wiuld be being smart or answering the final question then why the hell do we still have to judge the girls in three other categories? WHY NOT REMOVE BEAUTY AND POISE OR BODY IN THE CRITERIA, since everyone is saying that beauty is subjective anyways?
Why didn’t they have the Top 16 in Intelligence battle it out instead. I mean, they are all beautifull and sexy, atleast in your definition of beauty. Don’t tell me Indonesia or India or Italy are that fucking ugly and has a bad body that they scored really low on thos two other categories?
I SAY SHOW US ALL THE SCORES GIVEN TO EACH AND EVERY CANDIDATES IN ALL THE THREE CATEGORIES. ONLY THEN WOULD PEOPLE STOP CALLING THIS PAGEANT A FRAUD. Cause seriously, in probably the strongest batch of candidates Miss Earth has ever had how the hell did this happen?????????