RatedX wrote:WIll there be a raw rambutan seed eating contest, where the one who eats the most raw rambutan seeds will be the winner of Cooking with MasterChef Julia er I mean MW 2017?
the critic wrote:
ITS TOO EARLY TO CONFIRM BUT ROLENE PLANS TO BE A JUDGE AND MEGAN IS SET TO HOST AGAIN.
MISS WORLD 2017 IS SET TO BE THE PAGEANT OF ALL PAGEANT. GREAT JOB JULIA.
prowazekii wrote:the critic wrote:
ITS TOO EARLY TO CONFIRM BUT ROLENE PLANS TO BE A JUDGE AND MEGAN IS SET TO HOST AGAIN.
MISS WORLD 2017 IS SET TO BE THE PAGEANT OF ALL PAGEANT. GREAT JOB JULIA.
and its a thrash in.the uk
Stoichio wrote:lingintexas wrote:They are obsessed with PUERTO RICO if it was any other country they would of MOVED on by now. That`s why they create all these stupid little insignificant pageants to gain more titles like Miss Earthworm. Quantity does not equal quantity. Puerto Ricos overall standing in Miss UNIverse and Miss World is still higher than the Phillipines FACT.
Check your facts right!
PR may have more crowns but PH have more call-outs in both Miss Universe & MW! Pozo negro!
The Duchess wrote:lingintexas wrote:They are obsessed with PUERTO RICO if it was any other country they would of MOVED on by now. That`s why they create all these stupid little insignificant pageants to gain more titles like Miss Earthworm. Quantity does not equal quantity. Puerto Ricos overall standing in Miss UNIverse and Miss World is still higher than the Phillipines FACT.
The Philippines' problem is not lack of quality, their contestants post 2010 are pretty good some even great. Their Philippines' problem is the fans in this forum.
Iknowbeauty wrote:The Duchess wrote:lingintexas wrote:They are obsessed with PUERTO RICO if it was any other country they would of MOVED on by now. That`s why they create all these stupid little insignificant pageants to gain more titles like Miss Earthworm. Quantity does not equal quantity. Puerto Ricos overall standing in Miss UNIverse and Miss World is still higher than the Phillipines FACT.
The Philippines' problem is not lack of quality, their contestants post 2010 are pretty good some even great. Their Philippines' problem is the fans in this forum.
Its not just on this forum. Their pageant fans have a bad reputation everywhere. They're bitter on youtube, facebook, everywhere. They think they're entitled to have more Miss World crowns just because they have many crowns in all the other pageants.
manoypoe wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:The Duchess wrote:lingintexas wrote:They are obsessed with PUERTO RICO if it was any other country they would of MOVED on by now. That`s why they create all these stupid little insignificant pageants to gain more titles like Miss Earthworm. Quantity does not equal quantity. Puerto Ricos overall standing in Miss UNIverse and Miss World is still higher than the Phillipines FACT.
The Philippines' problem is not lack of quality, their contestants post 2010 are pretty good some even great. Their Philippines' problem is the fans in this forum.
Its not just on this forum. Their pageant fans have a bad reputation everywhere. They're bitter on youtube, facebook, everywhere. They think they're entitled to have more Miss World crowns just because they have many crowns in all the other pageants.
AGAIN YOU ARE SHOWING YOUR STUPIDITY FOR THE SAKE OF HAVING SOMETHING TO SAY. DONT SPEW MORE STUPIDITY PLEASE.
WHEN DO WE THINK WE ARE ENTITLED TO HAVE MORE CROWNS BECAUSE WE HAVE MANY CROWNS IN OTHER PAGEANTS?
WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME WE PROTESTED? DID WE PROTEST ON THE NON PLACEMENT OF VALERIE EVEN IF VALERIE WAS FLAGRANTLY IGNORED EVEN IN TOP MODEL? DID WE PROTEST ABOUT THE PLACEMENT OF HILLARIE EVEN IF MANY FOREIGNERS BELIEVED SHE DESERVED HIGHER PLACEMENT?
DID WE PROTEST BECAUSE GWEN ONLY GOT FIRST RUNNER-UP? NAH NEVER. WE DID NOT EVEN REJOICE IN HER VICTORY COZ MANY DID NOT THINK SHE WAS THAT DESERVING. HER VICTORY DID NOT ELEVATE HER STATUS IN THE PHILIPPINES. CANT YOU SEE HOW FAIR SOME IF NOT MOST FILIPINOS ARE?
THERE ARE ONLY TWO INSTANCES WE FILIPINOS BELIEVED THAT WE DESERVED MISS WORLD. THOSE ARE WITH RUFFA AND CATRIONA. EVANGELINE IS ANOTHER STORY. AND WE ALL KNOW THAT OUR CLAIMS ARE VALID. SO STOP SPREADING YOUR IDIOTIC COMMENT, YOU CAN DO MUCH BETTER NEXT TIME.
BUT I DO AGREE THAT SOME FILIPINOS ARE IDIOTS. HOW I WISH THEY ARE PESTS SO THAT THEY CAN BE EASILY EXTERMINATED.
Iknowbeauty wrote:People complaining about this format, but how do you expect to evaluate over 100 contestants while making sure they all get a chance to be seen and heard? Your favorite pageants don't have to worry about that because they can never even reach the 100 mark. Miss World just might be having the most contestants they've ever had this year, and that's why these changes are necessary to give a chance to all the nations competing and make them feel represented.
hauteegirl wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:People complaining about this format, but how do you expect to evaluate over 100 contestants while making sure they all get a chance to be seen and heard? Your favorite pageants don't have to worry about that because they can never even reach the 100 mark. Miss World just might be having the most contestants they've ever had this year, and that's why these changes are necessary to give a chance to all the nations competing and make them feel represented.
because Miss World franchise is CHEAPER than Miss Universe... #fact
Iknowbeauty wrote:hauteegirl wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:People complaining about this format, but how do you expect to evaluate over 100 contestants while making sure they all get a chance to be seen and heard? Your favorite pageants don't have to worry about that because they can never even reach the 100 mark. Miss World just might be having the most contestants they've ever had this year, and that's why these changes are necessary to give a chance to all the nations competing and make them feel represented.
because Miss World franchise is CHEAPER than Miss Universe... #fact
In that case, pageants like Miss Earth, Miss Supranational, etc should attract even more countries than Miss World since the franchise fees are even cheaper than that of Miss World, but we know that's not the case. And isn't Miss International's franchise fee like $0.00? And yet this pageant can't even hit 80 countries.
hauteegirl wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:People complaining about this format, but how do you expect to evaluate over 100 contestants while making sure they all get a chance to be seen and heard? Your favorite pageants don't have to worry about that because they can never even reach the 100 mark. Miss World just might be having the most contestants they've ever had this year, and that's why these changes are necessary to give a chance to all the nations competing and make them feel represented.
because Miss World franchise is CHEAPER than Miss Universe... #fact
manoypoe wrote:prowazekii wrote:the critic wrote:
ITS TOO EARLY TO CONFIRM BUT ROLENE PLANS TO BE A JUDGE AND MEGAN IS SET TO HOST AGAIN.
MISS WORLD 2017 IS SET TO BE THE PAGEANT OF ALL PAGEANT. GREAT JOB JULIA.
and its a thrash in.the uk
I AGREE THAT IT IS GOING TO BE THE BIGGEST COOKING FESTIVAL OF ALL PAGEANTS.
Iknowbeauty wrote:hauteegirl wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:People complaining about this format, but how do you expect to evaluate over 100 contestants while making sure they all get a chance to be seen and heard? Your favorite pageants don't have to worry about that because they can never even reach the 100 mark. Miss World just might be having the most contestants they've ever had this year, and that's why these changes are necessary to give a chance to all the nations competing and make them feel represented.
because Miss World franchise is CHEAPER than Miss Universe... #fact
In that case, pageants like Miss Earth, Miss Supranational, etc should attract even more countries than Miss World since the franchise fees are even cheaper than that of Miss World, but we know that's not the case. And isn't Miss International's franchise fee like $0.00? And yet this pageant can't even hit 80 countries.
the critic wrote:hauteegirl wrote:Iknowbeauty wrote:People complaining about this format, but how do you expect to evaluate over 100 contestants while making sure they all get a chance to be seen and heard? Your favorite pageants don't have to worry about that because they can never even reach the 100 mark. Miss World just might be having the most contestants they've ever had this year, and that's why these changes are necessary to give a chance to all the nations competing and make them feel represented.
because Miss World franchise is CHEAPER than Miss Universe... #fact
ARE YOU THE ACCOUNTANT FOR A NATIONAL PAGEANT?
IF HAITI AND ETHIOPIA CAN AFFORD Miss Universe FRANCHISE IT'S CLEARLY NOT ABOUT EXPENSE. MW IS JUST MORE GLOBALLY RECOGNIZED IN EVEN THE TINIEST OF NATIONS. THATS WHY ITS PARTICIPATION IS HUGE.
chellomellow wrote:Miss Universe annually franchise fee is $9,400 US. That's what my country pays. Are you really going to trust a WordPress article lol
hauteegirl wrote:READ ON!
https://thepageantpedia.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/pageant-franchise-fee-the-cost-will-surprise-you/
Stoichio wrote:If an ugly 2nd runner up can easily outshine the rigged winner in 2016, isn't she categorized as UGLY AS F*CK???
The Duchess wrote:Stoichio wrote:If an ugly 2nd runner up can easily outshine the rigged winner in 2016, isn't she categorized as UGLY AS F*CK???
If a racist speaks, does it really make a sound?
chellomellow wrote:The Duchess wrote:Stoichio wrote:If an ugly 2nd runner up can easily outshine the rigged winner in 2016, isn't she categorized as UGLY AS F*CK???
If a racist speaks, does it really make a sound?
It's sad, I didn't expect him to be so racist. We were friends
muzical wrote:Is Miss Universe is not political????
Users browsing this forum: d7o0om, Fany