bigbangtheory wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
DEFINE ESTABLISHED. DO YOU MEAN AS LONG AS THEY STAGE IT EVEN THE PRELIMINARY ROUND IS DONE IN A PAMBARANGGAY CHEAP STAGE-- IS WHAT YOU CALL ESTABLISHED? OR PUSHING IT A BIT SO IT CAN EARN MORE MONEY AND HAVE A MORE DECENT VENUE THAN THE USUALLY CHEAP STAGE WHEN MW IS HELD IN UK. TELL ME.
Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
MISSUNIVERSEFANS wrote:bigbangtheory wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
DEFINE ESTABLISHED. DO YOU MEAN AS LONG AS THEY STAGE IT EVEN THE PRELIMINARY ROUND IS DONE IN A PAMBARANGGAY CHEAP STAGE-- IS WHAT YOU CALL ESTABLISHED? OR PUSHING IT A BIT SO IT CAN EARN MORE MONEY AND HAVE A MORE DECENT VENUE THAN THE USUALLY CHEAP STAGE WHEN MW IS HELD IN UK. TELL ME.
Miss World USED TO BE great in terms of production when it was broadcast on UK's channel 5 or even sponsored by Top Shop, but now it is no where to be found on UK tv, except satellite channels.
phuphuoc wrote:MISS WORLD is not the first beauty pageant, MISS UNIVERSE is ... Because that time it was just a bikini show (there wasn't a Crown or a Title) !!!
Since 1952, the first beauty queen is Armi Helena Kuusela to be crowned as Miss Universe.
That is the truth!!
shelunian wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
Miss America did it, why can't Miss Universe do it. As long as there's a pageant for 2014. It's more of a scheduling problem than financial.
How about Miss World being held again in London. If my memory serves me right, Miss World was in London for its first 25 years while Miss Universe was already in Asia for its '74 edition.
ab2 wrote:I'm not an expert on this or anything, and forgive me if I'm wrong, but I think the first edition of "Miss Universe" or the International Pageant of Pulchritude was held in 1926 where Cathrine Moylan from the US won. But because of WW2, the pageant was cancelled, and then returned in 1952 with a different organiser. So I think it should be the oldest pageant.
Lisl Goldarbeiter, Miss Universe 1929 from Austria
phuphuoc wrote:MISS WORLD is not the first beauty pageant, MISS UNIVERSE is ... Because that time it was just a bikini show (there wasn't a Crown or a Title) !!!
Since 1952, the first beauty queen is Armi Helena Kuusela to be crowned as Miss Universe.
That is the truth!!
ab2 wrote:I'm not an expert on this or anything, and forgive me if I'm wrong, but I think the first edition of "Miss Universe" or the International Pageant of Pulchritude was held in 1926 where Cathrine Moylan from the US won. But because of WW2, the pageant was cancelled, and then returned in 1952 with a different organiser. So I think it should be the oldest pageant.
Lisl Goldarbeiter, Miss Universe 1929 from Austria
the critic wrote:MISSUNIVERSEFANS wrote:bigbangtheory wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
DEFINE ESTABLISHED. DO YOU MEAN AS LONG AS THEY STAGE IT EVEN THE PRELIMINARY ROUND IS DONE IN A PAMBARANGGAY CHEAP STAGE-- IS WHAT YOU CALL ESTABLISHED? OR PUSHING IT A BIT SO IT CAN EARN MORE MONEY AND HAVE A MORE DECENT VENUE THAN THE USUALLY CHEAP STAGE WHEN MW IS HELD IN UK. TELL ME.
Miss World USED TO BE great in terms of production when it was broadcast on UK's channel 5 or even sponsored by Top Shop, but now it is no where to be found on UK tv, except satellite channels.
LOL. THAT'S THE THING MISS WORLD... IT'S STILL SURVIVING N STILL RELEVANT WITHOUT UK NETWORKS SPONSORING IT. UK IS NOT THE ONLY COUNTRY YET STILL MW IS THE MAIN REASON FOR ALL MAJOR UK PAGEANTS. IT'S NOT LIKE Miss Universe TOOK MW PLACE IN THE UK...IN FACT MISS UNIVERSE ISN'T ANYTHING THERE. MISS WORLD WAS BOLD ENOUGH TO HOST MISS WORLD 1991IN ATLANTA. NO CITY IN THE UK WOULD EVER HOST Miss Universe.
BTW IF Miss Universe RATINGS SHOULD DROP ANY LOWER IN USA THAN IT ALREADY IS I'M SURE NBC WOULD PULL THE PLUG.
the critic wrote:shelunian wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
Miss America did it, why can't Miss Universe do it. As long as there's a pageant for 2014. It's more of a scheduling problem than financial.
How about Miss World being held again in London. If my memory serves me right, Miss World was in London for its first 25 years while Miss Universe was already in Asia for its '74 edition.
MISS AMERICA IS NOT AN INTERNATIONAL PAGEANT NOWADAYS IT'S JUST A NATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP PLATFORM FOR YOUNG LADIES COVERED AS A BEAUTY CONTEST. LOL. THE REASON IT SKIPPED A YEAR WAS DUE TO SERIOUS DIFFICULTIES THAT COULD'VE ENDED THE ORG.
AND MISS WORLD HAD NO REASON TO LEAVE LONDON... ALL ITS SPONSORS WERE BASED THERE AND THE BBC WANTED IT THERE.
AbiRose wrote:the critic wrote:shelunian wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
Miss America did it, why can't Miss Universe do it. As long as there's a pageant for 2014. It's more of a scheduling problem than financial.
How about Miss World being held again in London. If my memory serves me right, Miss World was in London for its first 25 years while Miss Universe was already in Asia for its '74 edition.
MISS AMERICA IS NOT AN INTERNATIONAL PAGEANT NOWADAYS IT'S JUST A NATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP PLATFORM FOR YOUNG LADIES COVERED AS A BEAUTY CONTEST. LOL. THE REASON IT SKIPPED A YEAR WAS DUE TO SERIOUS DIFFICULTIES THAT COULD'VE ENDED THE ORG.
AND MISS WORLD HAD NO REASON TO LEAVE LONDON... ALL ITS SPONSORS WERE BASED THERE AND THE BBC WANTED IT THERE.
Miss America did NOT skip a year - they crowned Mallory Hagan in January and Nina Davuluri in September of 2013. The reason being that after Mallory won in Vegas, the Pageant was moved back to Atlantic City and the traditional September crowning, so Mallory only reigned 9 months (as they brought the edition forward, rather than pushing back so Mallory reigned 18 months) and Nina a year (she crowned her successor recently)
the critic wrote:AbiRose wrote:the critic wrote:shelunian wrote:Stage Diva wrote:I agree but Miss World I think is more established pageant today than Miss Universe because they will stage a pageant for 2014 not 2015 if you know what i mean..
Miss America did it, why can't Miss Universe do it. As long as there's a pageant for 2014. It's more of a scheduling problem than financial.
How about Miss World being held again in London. If my memory serves me right, Miss World was in London for its first 25 years while Miss Universe was already in Asia for its '74 edition.
MISS AMERICA IS NOT AN INTERNATIONAL PAGEANT NOWADAYS IT'S JUST A NATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP PLATFORM FOR YOUNG LADIES COVERED AS A BEAUTY CONTEST. LOL. THE REASON IT SKIPPED A YEAR WAS DUE TO SERIOUS DIFFICULTIES THAT COULD'VE ENDED THE ORG.
AND MISS WORLD HAD NO REASON TO LEAVE LONDON... ALL ITS SPONSORS WERE BASED THERE AND THE BBC WANTED IT THERE.
Miss America did NOT skip a year - they crowned Mallory Hagan in January and Nina Davuluri in September of 2013. The reason being that after Mallory won in Vegas, the Pageant was moved back to Atlantic City and the traditional September crowning, so Mallory only reigned 9 months (as they brought the edition forward, rather than pushing back so Mallory reigned 18 months) and Nina a year (she crowned her successor recently)
THAT'S HOW I RECALLED WHAT HAPPENED IN MISS AMERICA. WHAT I DON'T RECALL IS HOW THE REACHED A JANUARY DATE A FEW YEARS AGO.
Users browsing this forum: Seo-Ul-Zef