Stoichio wrote:IT'S SO FUNNY TO KNOW THAT
CLAPPERS
&
LOSERS
THINK ALIKE
CLAPPERS : Laura Spoya (clapper in MI & Miss Universe, Miss Germany 2015)
LOSER: scavenger rockingay Nino 'clitorisless' Cleopatro
WHILE
WINNERS
& GREAT NAMES
THINK ALIKE!
I don't need to post what other celebrities and great names said. Coz it will only hurt the loser
PEREZ HILTON: "The best thing that could ever happen to Miss Colombia is to lose. The pageant was rigged! It was rigged when Steve Harvey announced Colombia as the winner."
Niecy Nash: "When Colombia was announced as the winner. We were all shocked! Across all boards, Philippines was our winner. All 4 judges unanimously voted for Philippines."
And here are some of the finalists & semi-finalists of MU2015 on what they saw versus the fake news by sourgraping clappers and rockingay Nino who flops 'its' predictions and flops with its fabricated/fake news.
[youtube]ZrFuNReYIW8[/youtube]
[youtube]MLVJekNOPgs[/youtube]
WHO ARE MORE CREDIBLE???
FINALIST/SEMI-FINALIST
OR
CLAPPERS???
COURT JUDGE: What are those EXHIBITS???
Can someone put a brain on whoever is behind this???
Nina Cleopatra wrote:Affected much? Clearly as Laura Spoya said, Your conscience is killing you!
sleuth08 wrote:2001 IS PROBABLY THE YEAR OF THE MOST SCANDALS:
FROM FRANCE'S SUPPOSED RUMORS SHE IS ACTUALY A HE
TO BRAZIL'S PLASTUC SURGERY
TO ISRAEL'S GOVERNMENT REQUIRING THEIR CANDIDATE TO WEAR A BULLET PROOF VEST DURING THE PAGEANT.
BUT PUERTO RICO'S WIN IS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL OF ALL
IF THERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF POLITICS COMING INT PLAY, 2001 IS THE BEST EXAMPLE OF IT. EVELINA OF GREECE WAS THE SURE WINNER BACK THEN. HER PERFORMANCE WAS FLAWLESS - WHY WOULD PEOPLE NAME THE AWARD AFTER HER FOR THE BEST CATWALK
BUT SADLY BECAUSE PUERTO RICO HOSTED THE PAGEANT, AND THE AUDIENCE WAS ALREADY YELLING. MUO LET PUERTO RICO WIN TO APPEASE THE AUDIENCE OR ELSE A RIOT WILL ENSUE
IF ANOTHER COUNTRY HOSTED MISS UNIVERSE IN 2001, FOR SURE EVELINA WILL WIN HANDS DOWN.
Nina Cleopatra wrote:sleuth08 wrote:2001 IS PROBABLY THE YEAR OF THE MOST SCANDALS:
FROM FRANCE'S SUPPOSED RUMORS SHE IS ACTUALY A HE
TO BRAZIL'S PLASTUC SURGERY
TO ISRAEL'S GOVERNMENT REQUIRING THEIR CANDIDATE TO WEAR A BULLET PROOF VEST DURING THE PAGEANT.
BUT PUERTO RICO'S WIN IS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL OF ALL
IF THERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF POLITICS COMING INT PLAY, 2001 IS THE BEST EXAMPLE OF IT. EVELINA OF GREECE WAS THE SURE WINNER BACK THEN. HER PERFORMANCE WAS FLAWLESS - WHY WOULD PEOPLE NAME THE AWARD AFTER HER FOR THE BEST CATWALK
BUT SADLY BECAUSE PUERTO RICO HOSTED THE PAGEANT, AND THE AUDIENCE WAS ALREADY YELLING. MUO LET PUERTO RICO WIN TO APPEASE THE AUDIENCE OR ELSE A RIOT WILL ENSUE
IF ANOTHER COUNTRY HOSTED MISS UNIVERSE IN 2001, FOR SURE EVELINA WILL WIN HANDS DOWN.
Certainly not even half as controversial and debatable as Miss Universe 2001. I still think Miss Universe 2001 crown was bought.
Stoichio wrote:IT'S SO FUNNY TO KNOW THAT
CLAPPERS
&
LOSERS
THINK ALIKE
CLAPPERS : Laura Spoya (clapper in MI & Miss Universe, Miss Germany 2015)
LOSER: scavenger rockingay Nino 'clitorisless' Cleopatro
WHILE
WINNERS
& GREAT NAMES
THINK ALIKE!
I don't need to post what other celebrities and great names said. Coz it will only hurt the loser
PEREZ HILTON: "The best thing that could ever happen to Miss Colombia is to lose. The pageant was rigged! It was rigged when Steve Harvey announced Colombia as the winner."
Niecy Nash: "When Colombia was announced as the winner. We were all shocked! Across all boards, Philippines was our winner. All 4 judges unanimously voted for Philippines."
And here are some of the finalists & semi-finalists of MU2015 on what they saw versus the fake news by sourgraping clappers and rockingay Nino who flops 'its' predictions and flops with its fabricated/fake news.
[youtube]ZrFuNReYIW8[/youtube]
[youtube]MLVJekNOPgs[/youtube]
WHO ARE MORE CREDIBLE???
FINALIST/SEMI-FINALIST
OR
CLAPPERS???
COURT JUDGE: What are those EXHIBITS???
Can someone put a brain on whoever is behind this???
[/quote]HARVIN wrote:Hi again Nina
Nina Cleopatra wrote:sleuth08 wrote:2001 IS PROBABLY THE YEAR OF THE MOST SCANDALS:
FROM FRANCE'S SUPPOSED RUMORS SHE IS ACTUALY A HE
TO BRAZIL'S PLASTUC SURGERY
TO ISRAEL'S GOVERNMENT REQUIRING THEIR CANDIDATE TO WEAR A BULLET PROOF VEST DURING THE PAGEANT.
BUT PUERTO RICO'S WIN IS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL OF ALL
IF THERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF POLITICS COMING INT PLAY, 2001 IS THE BEST EXAMPLE OF IT. EVELINA OF GREECE WAS THE SURE WINNER BACK THEN. HER PERFORMANCE WAS FLAWLESS - WHY WOULD PEOPLE NAME THE AWARD AFTER HER FOR THE BEST CATWALK
BUT SADLY BECAUSE PUERTO RICO HOSTED THE PAGEANT, AND THE AUDIENCE WAS ALREADY YELLING. MUO LET PUERTO RICO WIN TO APPEASE THE AUDIENCE OR ELSE A RIOT WILL ENSUE
IF ANOTHER COUNTRY HOSTED MISS UNIVERSE IN 2001, FOR SURE EVELINA WILL WIN HANDS DOWN.
Certainly not even half as controversial and debatable as Miss Universe 2015. No queen refuted Denise win unlike with Pia, where the majority of the contestants though and still think Miss Universe 2015 crown was bought.
Smile wrote:In my eyes, Miss Universe 2015 will always be Colombia.
Declan wrote:
MAJORITY = PERU, INDIA, GERMANY, VENEZUELA???
Nina Cleopatra wrote:Declan wrote:
MAJORITY = PERU, INDIA, GERMANY, VENEZUELA???
Wait til you see Exhibit E!
Stoichio wrote:Nina Cleopatra wrote:Declan wrote:
MAJORITY = PERU, INDIA, GERMANY, VENEZUELA???
Wait til you see Exhibit E!
While it only takes 5 se onds to get all the hundreds of positive things people around the world and BIG NAMES in the showbusiness industry say about her and our hosting of MU2016!
Oma-san wrote:It cannot be denied that the big wins for Puerto Rico have either taken place because of investments (hosting the pageant) or when there are Puerto Rican judges on the panel who consistently award high scores to the delegates. Wikipedia shows the concentration of Puerto Rican placements in the Trump bought Miss Universe era. Puerto Rico has failed to place after that.
A die hard pageant fan country like Puerto Rico takes many pains and efforts when preparing their contestants so some results can be expected. Rather than being patient and persevering to secure a deserving win such as the 2014 Miss International win, they grab the opportunity whenever they can to buy their crown. It's tasteless. A well-earned victory is much more enjoyable in my honest opinion.
onecoolday wrote:Nina Cleopatra wrote:Fact: Puerto Rico Failed to make a back to back like Venezuela.
Fact: Puerto Rico can only win in an American soil.
Fact: They flopped even with all the help of the MUO and all at once.
Fact: This is the root of their envy, frustration and animosity.
Fact: The welfare island could not even make a back to back, so why mock the Filipinos for being able to make a back to back.
Fact: The Philippines could not make a hometown win because there were no Filipino judges, unlike the welfare island who insisted that there should be two hometown judges.
Fact: The Philippines did not place because she was not meant to be. Unlike the welfare island who did not have decency to refuse Trump's offer in exchange for hosting, and his business interest in the island.
Fact: You can't accept the fact that welfare island invented bribery, the Philippines just perfected it with more class.
Nina Cleopatra wrote:starphil wrote:THIS PINOY IS SO BITTER! AS ALWAYS.. WHY SHE DIDN'T TALK ABOUT PIA'S UNDESERVING WIN LAST YEAR... JUST BECAUSE THEY WILL HOST THE PAGEANT THE NEXT YEAR! PIA DOESN'T LEFT A GOOD REIGNING IMPRESSION TO MOST OF US, EXCEPT PINOYS THEMSELVES
Pia not also disappointing as Miss Universe, she also disappointing many Pinoys with her slutty beahaviour over really doing something for the Org. Pia was never at the level of a true Miss Universe.
Users browsing this forum: Svetlohp