What Miss Supranational Lacks





  • 1

What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby sissymeow » Tue Jun 09, 2020 4:21 am

    

Miss Supranationals production is truly phenomenal. The final night is much more greater than Miss World however, the pageant itself lacks personality. What i mean about that is their winners are just physically beautiful but without any special trait. Unlike Miss Earth, Miss Universe, Miss International and Miss World, we see that the girls won not just because of physical beauty but also because of their amazing personality, intelligence and talent. I appreciate the recent changes in Miss Supranationals format when they inserted the Q and A round recently but it didnt really gave me that "wow, this girl is everything" factor, they are just giving me like,"yes she is pretty".

What can you say about this? lets talk


Image


User avatar
sissymeow
Dark green members are SEMI-ACTIVE posters.
Dark green members are SEMI-ACTIVE posters.
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri May 18, 2018 7:11 am
Country: Australia (au)
Reputation: 223
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: none
Hobbies/Interests: none and none
Message: Write a message here

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby hauteegirl » Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:14 am

This pageant lacks X-Factor.
User avatar
hauteegirl
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
 
Posts: 7669
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:03 am
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 10022
Real Life Name/Nick: Queen
Date of Birth: 14 Jan 2008
Gender: Female
Sexual Orientation: Straight
Profession: beauty queen
Hobbies/Interests: exotic plants hobbyist
Message: ahh shut up!

  • 3

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby beautywatchnyc » Tue Jun 09, 2020 7:10 am


Who wants another copycat reproduction when pageants have to have their own distinct identity and platform to be identifiable with? It boggles the mind to think why MS should strive to be in the same mold or even better than what its elder counterpart could be? Ms U Extra Unlimited or MW Extra Unlimited, is that what we want?
User avatar
beautywatchnyc
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
 
Posts: 9630
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: New York City (former) now residing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, SW5
Country: United Kingdom (uk)
Reputation: 14068
Real Life Name/Nick: david
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: HR Consultancy, Professional Cooking
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Chinese Zodiac: Horse
Hobbies/Interests: Surfing D Net Cooking Travel Reading Pho2graphy
Message: Need to reflect the other side of my citizenship

  • 1

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby artaestes » Tue Jun 09, 2020 1:03 pm

miss supranational is just like modeling contest...
though a lot if stunning girls hut that’s just it...
they must have an advocacy in order to be recognized as a real international pageant..
User avatar
artaestes
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
 
Posts: 2395
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:07 pm
Location: jeddah, ksa
Country: Saudi Arabia (sa)
Reputation: 1021
Real Life Name/Nick: ralhp
Date of Birth: 19 Jan 1985
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Bisexual
Profession: blue collar
Western Zodiac Sign: Capricorn
Hobbies/Interests: movies
Message: Write a message heregood day

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby Jon A » Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:16 pm

1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.
Jon A
PAGEANT EXPERTS are MASTERS & PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS of pageantry.
PAGEANT EXPERTS are MASTERS & PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS of pageantry.
 
Posts: 10014
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: USA
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 2823
Date of Birth: 19 Jan 1973
Gender: Male
Profession: consultant
Western Zodiac Sign: Capricorn
Hobbies/Interests: Reading, Travelling, Pageants
Message: Write a message here

  • 4

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby XAMURAI » Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:11 am

Jon A wrote:1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.


Or maybe it's just you who doesn't want to be a baby Miss International because you cannot afford to fly to Japan and experience Japanese culture that ALL delegates of Miss International experience with royal treatment and satisfaction. Ask all national queens who got sent by the same organization to various pageants and they can tell you which pageant treated them with respect and dignity! Something that you won't understand because you're just stuck into one hemisphere.

Try to downplay MI once again, I can forgive you. But to even have the audacity to praise MGI, that makes you undeserving of your Pageant Expert tag. You're just a pageant fan - more like a Miss Universe fan - but definitely not an expert. Your flop predictions are just the tip of the ice berg...
My Interview for GMA Western Visayas

[youtube]0UHn679-4P4[/youtube]
User avatar
XAMURAI
ADMINS are OFFICIAL staffers of Missosology.
ADMINS are OFFICIAL staffers of Missosology.
 
Posts: 15587
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:18 am
Location: Saitama
Country: Japan (jp)
Reputation: 10858
Real Life Name/Nick: XAMURAI
Date of Birth: 01 Jul 1979
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Company Employee and Entrepreneur
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Hobbies/Interests: Basketball and Camping
Message: Do not PM me if you want to change your username.

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby Ea'rend¿l » Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:27 am

:))33 :))33 :))33
Image
User avatar
Ea'rend¿l
Dark green members are SEMI-ACTIVE posters.
Dark green members are SEMI-ACTIVE posters.
 
Posts: 26360
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:37 pm
Country: Ireland (ie)
Reputation: 21078
Real Life Name/Nick: Earendil
Date of Birth: 12 Sep 1986
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Knight of Templar
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Tiger
Hobbies/Interests: Astronomy and Chasing Time

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby jhunz23 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:50 am

Walang Purpose
Walang Advochazie Kineme
Walang Platform!
jhunz23
PIONEERS are the most experienced members of Missosology.
PIONEERS are the most experienced members of Missosology.
 
Posts: 2112
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 6:09 am
Location: Pampanga
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 2390
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Profession: teacher
Western Zodiac Sign: Leo
Chinese Zodiac: Rooster
Hobbies/Interests: reading
Message: Write a message here

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby quelab22 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 5:15 am

clear platform and advocacy
enjoy and have fun
User avatar
quelab22
PROFESSIONALS are DIPLOMATIC and QUALITY posters.
PROFESSIONALS are DIPLOMATIC and QUALITY posters.
 
Posts: 13934
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:34 am
Location: philippines
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 3601
Real Life Name/Nick: Quela Andrea... (queng)
Date of Birth: 22 Oct 1993
Gender: Female
Profession: escort... of my father
Western Zodiac Sign: Scorpio
Hobbies/Interests: watching fairytales
Message: bongga tayung mga taga misso...

  • 1

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby beautywatchnyc » Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:27 am

Jon A wrote:1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.


You're just a hater! Grow up and update yourself with what's happening in the pageant world!
User avatar
beautywatchnyc
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
 
Posts: 9630
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: New York City (former) now residing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, SW5
Country: United Kingdom (uk)
Reputation: 14068
Real Life Name/Nick: david
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: HR Consultancy, Professional Cooking
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Chinese Zodiac: Horse
Hobbies/Interests: Surfing D Net Cooking Travel Reading Pho2graphy
Message: Need to reflect the other side of my citizenship

  • 1

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby ajsy0203 » Wed Jun 10, 2020 9:10 am

Awareness from non-netizens (who are not actively on social media). The only time Miss Supranational aired on Philippine free TV when Mutya Datul won the pageant in 2013 but subsequent years GMA or other free TV networks apparently declined to air the pageant.

The results of Queen of Decades game gave a not so good impression to MS. Only 3 of them made it to the Top 20 but none of them advanced further. All 3 of them who made the first cut scored low in the Intelligence category.
Last edited by ajsy0203 on Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ajsy0203
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
PAGEANT HISTORIANS are walking encyclopedias of pageantry.
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:55 am
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 4760
Real Life Name/Nick: AJ
Date of Birth: 05 Sep 1986
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Office Staff
Western Zodiac Sign: Virgo
Chinese Zodiac: Tiger
Hobbies/Interests: Teaching
Message: Write a message here

  • 1

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby Jon A » Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:07 pm

beautywatchnyc wrote:
Jon A wrote:1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.


You're just a hater! Grow up and update yourself with what's happening in the pageant world!


Why a hater? That is so dumb. The POINT of the thread and the question asked is what Supra lacks. This is MY opinion - and nothing here is hateful! If you disagree with any specific arguments, please feel free to argue, it's just a discussion, nothing more. I personally think my points are sensible -- I praise Supra's winners, production, and non-controversial approach, and argue that their timing and lack of a distinct identity hold it back.
Jon A
PAGEANT EXPERTS are MASTERS & PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS of pageantry.
PAGEANT EXPERTS are MASTERS & PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS of pageantry.
 
Posts: 10014
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: USA
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 2823
Date of Birth: 19 Jan 1973
Gender: Male
Profession: consultant
Western Zodiac Sign: Capricorn
Hobbies/Interests: Reading, Travelling, Pageants
Message: Write a message here

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby Jon A » Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:17 pm

XAMURAI wrote:
Jon A wrote:1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.


Or maybe it's just you who doesn't want to be a baby Miss International because you cannot afford to fly to Japan and experience Japanese culture that ALL delegates of Miss International experience with royal treatment and satisfaction. Ask all national queens who got sent by the same organization to various pageants and they can tell you which pageant treated them with respect and dignity! Something that you won't understand because you're just stuck into one hemisphere.

Try to downplay MI once again, I can forgive you. But to even have the audacity to praise MGI, that makes you undeserving of your Pageant Expert tag. You're just a pageant fan - more like a Miss Universe fan - but definitely not an expert. Your flop predictions are just the tip of the ice berg...


First of all, I have been to Japan over 30 times, and I always stay at the very best of Japanese hotels, so please don't assume what I can and cannot do. And I certainly don't need your pronouncements on my expertise or lack thereof.
I know you just want to defend your contest, and that is fine, and no one is saying that the International girls are not treated well during their stay. I did not criticize MI in any way here. My point was just that Supra mirrors MI in the way that it is non-controversial, subdued and elegant. However, as one of the original pageants, MI occupies a distinct space - where it has prestige but has never risen to the level of awareness and prestige as MW or Miss Universe in a public sense (arguably it has that cache amongst pageants). Therefore, a more low key version of it does not really work. Even MI in recent years has been changing to create more activities and relevance for it's winner, be more inclusive, enhance its production....so they themselves are evolving in a positive direction.So the point is that being a more subdued version of MI just does not make sense.
Jon A
PAGEANT EXPERTS are MASTERS & PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS of pageantry.
PAGEANT EXPERTS are MASTERS & PROFESSIONAL ANALYSTS of pageantry.
 
Posts: 10014
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: USA
Country: United States (us)
Reputation: 2823
Date of Birth: 19 Jan 1973
Gender: Male
Profession: consultant
Western Zodiac Sign: Capricorn
Hobbies/Interests: Reading, Travelling, Pageants
Message: Write a message here

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby beautywatchnyc » Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:04 am

Jon A wrote:
beautywatchnyc wrote:
Jon A wrote:1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.


You're just a hater! Grow up and update yourself with what's happening in the pageant world!


Why a hater? That is so dumb. The POINT of the thread and the question asked is what Supra lacks. This is MY opinion - and nothing here is hateful! If you disagree with any specific arguments, please feel free to argue, it's just a discussion, nothing more. I personally think my points are sensible -- I praise Supra's winners, production, and non-controversial approach, and argue that their timing and lack of a (and unlike Earth distinct identity hold it back.


Dumber than dumb? ... "(... and unlike Earth ...)" You have the floor all to yourself! You can praise Supranational to the highest heavens without mentioning Grand, Earth, etc. And when a forumer fired back a reply, you raised your point as merely a defense of discussion, really? What fair game you got there!
User avatar
beautywatchnyc
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
VIP MEMBERS are REAL LIFE candidates or PAGEANT ORGANIZERS.
 
Posts: 9630
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
Location: New York City (former) now residing in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, SW5
Country: United Kingdom (uk)
Reputation: 14068
Real Life Name/Nick: david
Date of Birth: 21 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: HR Consultancy, Professional Cooking
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Chinese Zodiac: Horse
Hobbies/Interests: Surfing D Net Cooking Travel Reading Pho2graphy
Message: Need to reflect the other side of my citizenship

  • 0

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby brent520 » Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:48 pm

Lacks everything.. from stealing national directors, to bad mouthing other pageants, to lacking in advocacy, to zero activities of winners except crowning national delegates

This is a low tier pageant that lacks class and professionalism in the pageant world
User avatar
brent520
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
ELITES are highly regarded as FINEST posters of Missosology.
 
Posts: 4548
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:41 am
Location: Maynila
Country: Philippines (ph)
Reputation: 4532
Date of Birth: 20 May 2012
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Bum
Hobbies/Interests: Studying, Working (is this even a hobby?)
Message: Hi to all.. Just here to enjoy beautiful women

  • 1

Re: What Miss Supranational Lacks

Postby XAMURAI » Mon Jun 15, 2020 1:44 am

Jon A wrote:
XAMURAI wrote:
Jon A wrote:1. I think it lacks a clear identity.
I think they do everything well, good lineup, (and unlike Earth and Grand they are trying more to get girls from the national contests (although they made a mess in Mexico) so that adds legitimacy), good stage, great production, solid pre-pageant. I also really like their winners, every girl (with the exception of Jenny Kim and Asha Bhat) is gorgeous -- all girls who one could see winning Miss World or Miss Universe. The problem is that it is all a bit snoozy because it just seems a pastiche of all other pageants and one. has the "Ive seen it all before" reaction.
MW does the pre-pageant and class thing better, Miss Universe has the fan interest better, MGI has a more exciting format and has. found a way to get people to talk, MI does the boring thing better, ME does the regional pageant thing better. So that leaves MS with a big relevance question mark.

2. Good timing. Moving it to the spring or summer instead of sticking it on top of MW and Miss Universe would make a big difference. Who has the time to pay attention when the big two are going on?

I think though that what Supra has done really well is to establish a good foundation. But the step up to the next level is going to require some vision, courage, money and patience!
Right now if MGI is a baby Miss Universe and ME is a baby MW, MS is a baby MI. And NO ONE wants to be a baby MI.


Or maybe it's just you who doesn't want to be a baby Miss International because you cannot afford to fly to Japan and experience Japanese culture that ALL delegates of Miss International experience with royal treatment and satisfaction. Ask all national queens who got sent by the same organization to various pageants and they can tell you which pageant treated them with respect and dignity! Something that you won't understand because you're just stuck into one hemisphere.

Try to downplay MI once again, I can forgive you. But to even have the audacity to praise MGI, that makes you undeserving of your Pageant Expert tag. You're just a pageant fan - more like a Miss Universe fan - but definitely not an expert. Your flop predictions are just the tip of the ice berg...


First of all, I have been to Japan over 30 times, and I always stay at the very best of Japanese hotels, so please don't assume what I can and cannot do. And I certainly don't need your pronouncements on my expertise or lack thereof.
I know you just want to defend your contest, and that is fine, and no one is saying that the International girls are not treated well during their stay. I did not criticize MI in any way here. My point was just that Supra mirrors MI in the way that it is non-controversial, subdued and elegant. However, as one of the original pageants, MI occupies a distinct space - where it has prestige but has never risen to the level of awareness and prestige as MW or Miss Universe in a public sense (arguably it has that cache amongst pageants). Therefore, a more low key version of it does not really work. Even MI in recent years has been changing to create more activities and relevance for it's winner, be more inclusive, enhance its production....so they themselves are evolving in a positive direction.So the point is that being a more subdued version of MI just does not make sense.


You failed Jon... you really really failed miserably... Boasting that you've been to Japan and not being able to understand how Japan works? EPIC FAIL!

You see.. if you're really a TRUE pageant expert, you would dissect the reason why MI is like this. Have you ever thought that MI is not a money-generating TV show? Have you ever thought that the financial liquidity of the organization has nothing to do with broadcasting rights and ticket receipts?

Imagine if MI would indeed step up with our pageant gala, and use the girls as stage props in order to earn money? Imagine that? That would be awesome, right?

Better research first about MI... or better read more about MI. There are plenty of write ups that I wrote about this pageant before I got hired by the owner herself. READ. That's what real pageant experts do. That's what CREDIBLE and LEGITIMATE pageant experts do...
My Interview for GMA Western Visayas

[youtube]0UHn679-4P4[/youtube]
User avatar
XAMURAI
ADMINS are OFFICIAL staffers of Missosology.
ADMINS are OFFICIAL staffers of Missosology.
 
Posts: 15587
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:18 am
Location: Saitama
Country: Japan (jp)
Reputation: 10858
Real Life Name/Nick: XAMURAI
Date of Birth: 01 Jul 1979
Gender: Male
Sexual Orientation: Asexual
Profession: Company Employee and Entrepreneur
Western Zodiac Sign: Cancer
Hobbies/Interests: Basketball and Camping
Message: Do not PM me if you want to change your username.


Return to Miss Supranational

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


contact us to advertise with missosology

Reputation System ©'